1. What I would have done differently than the individuals would have been recorded all the events with the phone or asked one of the peers to take pictures. If I was Janet I would have recorded dates, times and location of the weird actions MacKenize was doing that were not appealing to her. I would have intervened at the very beginning of the bus ride when MacKenize was talking about her indirectly. It would have change the situation and the outcome would have been maybe in her fair with union.
2. The three strongest arguments in support of the union were MacKenize was being abusive to Janet, not enough evidence to punish Taggert and Dalton, and evidence proves that Janet was involved with one or more people in the back of the bus. On the other hand, the three strongest arguments for the Chief were MacKenize claim that Janet made up the scene because she was upset that MacKenize broke up with her, investigation was hamstrung by the union, therefore, the people from the bus were told not to give any information. What makes the three statements strong and relevant are the union acted before the chief could even finish the investigation. It is clear the investigation was cut off and no clear evidence was proven for both sides instead it was for the benefit of the Union. The Chief did all in his power to have justice outcome.…show more content… Ms. Janet Cruz was treated unfair, since the investigation was intervened by the union so people on the bus could not provide any information to the investigators. Janet was not fully supported by the Union since they dismissed the case as quickly as they could. The ramification of the other female officers was disclosed, so it did not support Janet during her case. The process in general was unfair therefore, Janet was not treated
