Money stolen... Dogs dying by the Bucket load... Spending over $300,000 in donations... Lawsuits and so much more didn't these dogs deserve even a little of Marc Ching's attention? …show more content…
Did he believe running off to Hawaii for a vacation, and Canada to save pigs would magically bring back to life all those dying dogs?
The question I am trying to convey is "How much will Marc Ching lie?" "What fairy tale is too big to tell, even for Marc Ching?" If I wanted to I could lie and make up all sorts of stories about Marc Ching and claim "Unnamed Sources" and using Marc Ching's "Ends Justifies The Means" excuse would be all I need to justify my lies.
Using Marc Ching's logic I can legitimately write "Marc Ching Slaughtered 700 Dogs" I would be correct if using the "End justifies the means" excuse he uses.
The word "Slaughtered" means kill (people or animals) in a cruel or violent way, typically in large numbers. I believe leaving them stuffed in cages in the sun with temperatures reaching 105 degree is cruel.
He claimed to have rescued these 1,000 dog so from that moment on he would be responsible. His cult will claim that the monks killed a majority of them, which is true, but he knew their history and had been warned and still gave them to them believing he could not be held responsible for their