Their focus is on the implications in Colorado. According to the authors, legalization of marijuana in Colorado would cause complex health effects to its citizens. It is the responsibility of the medical fraternity to give a perspective that has balance regarding the discussion of both the benefits and the risks. The article goes ahead to state that in the case of legalization of the drug in Colorado, there is likely to be an increase in intoxication that results from the legal use of marijuana. The detrimental effects of such are broken homes, accidents, and crime. Therefore, the authors note that there are likely to be more vices in case the drug becomes legal in Colorado. They agree that the drug has medicinal advantages, but they demur that the medical use warrants the legalization thereof. One strength of the article is the viewpoint of medical practitioners. Cho, Benz, Zaller, Warren, Risng, and McConnell (2014); and Merino (2011) lack the medical perspectives in their discussions. However, Monte, Zane, and Heard (2015) contains purely medical viewpoint. Therefore, while the other authors unintentionally indicated that the medical fraternity was for the support of the legalization, the article shows that it is untrue. In spite of this, the article has a weakness in the limitation of the research because they conduct it in Colorado