However, according to the Confrontation Clause, a criminal defendant is not guaranteed an absolute right to have a face to face meeting with the witnesses on a trail. Therefore, the clauses main purpose was to gain the evidence against the defendant by proving in an adversary proceeding before the trier of facts. There is a component that serves during a confrontation such as physical presence, oath, cross-examination, and demeanor of the observation. Still, the face to face confrontation is the core value of the Clause, is not indispensable, as a result, it would become hearsay. Craig suggested that the accuser rights are violated due to not having the right to observe, cross-examine, and allowing the jury the opportunity to see the demeanor of the witness. Later the court made a decision to allow the victim along with other children to testify by using the one-way closed circuit television. Furthermore, the interest of protecting a child from being traumatized during testifying is vital(Goodman, 1995). It is the State concern in the physical and psychological well-being of the abuse