Mcknight Tradition Analysis

Words: 670
Pages: 3

According to McKnight, reading the Bible with tradition is the right way to interpret the Bible, while traditionalists read the Bible through tradition due to the less risk. The latter method will cause wrong ideas, which contain that women are unsuitable to teach and lead ministries in a church. Via this problem, McKnight, who emphasizes that people should read the Bible as a story, which will teach readers how to listen, and to discern how to live the Bible in our world.
First, McKnight indicated that the Biblical tests fit in an ongoing story of “that was then, but this is now.” This could be recognized when we read the Bible with the plot and the story. In order to achieve that, we should embrace all of the contents of the Bible regardless of personal preferences. Though, traditionalists, who interpret the Bible without seeing it as the Story, left a wrong tradition for next generations. This wrong tradition includes the views of the hard patriarchy and the soft patriarchy. These wrong concepts lead churches to restrict teaching and preaching ministries to women. Then, McKnight concludes the right attitude is to have a renew-and-renewing mindset: mutuality. According to the mutuality view,
…show more content…
For me, this means that I need to avoid the personal preference when I am reading the Bible. For example, in 2 John and 3 John, elder forbade church members to show hospitality to those who have left in order to response to conflict in the church. In this point, I originally had thought that I should treat traitors as an enemy. Though, the conflict here meant a particular situation culture, when I read it as the Story, I found the message of loving one another in the Johannine letters. Then, I discovered that it is more objective when I read the Bible with tradition and as the Story, which way makes me concentrate more on the key conception of the