In a world full of technology, we are constantly stimulated by the media whether it’s through the television or the internet. We are able to receive information across the globe at any time of day. The problem with this is that not all of the information we are provided with is the true facts. With information from the article, “Who Is Responsible for Journalism” we can take a look into media ethics from a journalists stand point. The author of this article is John H. Manus, a former journalist, professor and media critic now writes about journalism and how it relates to democracy. This specific article describes how journalists impact the information provided in the news. A journalist’s ethical code becomes less relevant to media firms and more publicly deceptive to maximize their audiences. This article also addresses how the media is not meeting duties that apply to media that are listed in the prima facie duties. The journalist takes an, “Anything goes Approach,” their claims often made just to make a bigger profit by being unethical in their lack of honest information. This applies to the part of reading about the competitive approach with how the journalists’ use media to drive our views and gather their audience numbers. Media firms are willing to use exaggerated claims as long as it sells.
Journalist face a range of ethical issues on a regular basis, as mentioned in the article a journalists’ must give up personal gain in order to keep from unethical reporting. Media ethics draw on a range of philosophical principles, including Kant’s moral system, especially his belief in obeying such rules out of a sense of duty. Journalists need to commit to telling the truth to the public since they are in a professional role. A good journalists’ has loyalty toward the public and their employer, they provide accurate