Australian Criminal Appeal Law

Submitted By bitch2010
Words: 3101
Pages: 13
Open Document
1) Appeals laws precedent set by SA 22 Mar 2013, 11:10 am - Source: Karen Ashford, SBS
The most significant changes to Australia's criminal appeal laws in a century have been passed in South Australia, setting a precedent for reform which could flow all the way to the High Court. South Australia has passed reforms to allow prisoners a second chance to appeal their convictions in the case of compelling new evidence. Until now, people convicted of an offence have had a single right of appeal, and once that appeal is exhausted they have no further legal options, even if new evidence emerges. The South Australian change potentially prevents miscarriages of justice that could see innocent people languishing in prison while the real culprits remain free. The prospect of being able to present fresh evidence to court after an initial, failed appeal is about to become a reality in South Australia.Attorney General John Rau is bringing down sweeping reforms. "There have been many cases in Australia and overseas over many years where it's been more than suggested that an injustice ultimately has been done to a particular individual because some new material has come to light and they, for various reasons, have been unable to have that heard." At present, the only way such matters can be dealt with is to petition the state Governor to seek the intervention of the Attorney, a process Mr Rau describes as opaque and reliant on the discretion of the politician. "That is obviously a completely non-transparent process and it is one that from my experience the convicted people concerned don't feel very comfortable with because it is not transparent. The idea we have here is it will all be done in open court, it will be dealt with completely openly so that everyone can have confidence the system is dealing with these probably fairly rare but still very important cases." Retired professor of law at the University of Adelaide, Dr Robert Moles, has been campaigning for this reform for years. He's published books on forensic evidence and miscarriages of justice, compared justice systems in Australia, Britain and Canada, and presented a massive submission to the parliamentary inquiry that preceded these reforms. Mr Moles says change has been a long time coming."The appeal rights in Australia were first introduced after the British Criminal Appeal Act in 1907 and so the Australian equivalents were introduced in the various states and territories around about 1910, 1912, 1913. So we've had 100 years of unamended appeal rights, and they've always been consistent between the various states and territories." Robert Moles believes the fact there's now inconsistency will prompt other states and territories to act to maintain the principle of equality before the law.
"All Australians should have the same right to a fair trial and they should have the same right to a fair appeal. So if South Australians have a new statutory right of appeal then it follows logically that all other Australians should have the same statutory right of appeal, and so we expect that the other states and territories will have a careful look at this and before very long they will all legislate to bring themselves back into conformity with each other, as they have been for the last 100 years." Former High Court Justice Michael Kirby has publicly backed the reforms, having previously expressed frustration at the High Court's inability to accept fresh evidence. Dr Moles says there are at least a dozen cases in South Australia alone waiting to be tested under the changes. It includes the case of Aboriginal man Derek Bromley, who was convicted of murder in 1984. He maintains he is innocent. Bromley completed his sentence in 2008, yet has not been released. Before he can be freed he must complete a re-socialisation course which requires him to apologise for his crime and say he's a changed man - but Bromley won't show remorse for something he says he didn't do.Robert Moles
Show More

Related Documents: Australian Criminal Appeal Law

Essay about Legal Studies Notes

custom, rules, law, fairness, equality + justice, values and ethics Anarchy: The situation that exists in a society that does not have laws or state rule Custom: The collective habits, or traditions, that have been developed by a society over a long period of time Rules: The authoritative regulation of behaviour Fairness: The legitimate and proper conduct in the performance of an act or duty Equality: Suggests that everyone is treated the same. Formal equality occurs when the law provides that…

Words 6720 - Pages 27

Essay on Summer Chapters

Noelle Christensen AP Government 8/30/2014 Summer Work Chapter 5 Concept Questions 1. Why did the Articles of Confederation fail? a. Could not enforce laws b. Could not tax c. All 13 states had to approve d. Could not regulate interstate commerce e. Each state had its own laws f. Too much power to the states g. No central government 2. What was the immediate impact of Shay's Rebellion? a. It proved the Articles of Confederation would not work and it brought forth the Constitution. 3. What motivated…

Words 728 - Pages 3

CJUS310 D02 Should Youths Be Transferred To Adult Court CarmenWilliams Essays

century, out of necessity, the Supreme Court issued opinions which led to introducing stricter sanctions resembling those of criminal proceedings. There is much debate encircling the matter of transferring juveniles to adult court and a verdict of a life term without parole, for it commensurated with capital punishment. The rationalization used by secularists is that the human brain is not entirely developed until around twenty five years of age; therefore, a juvenile cannot be held liable for their…

Words 2037 - Pages 9

Legal Studies 1 Essay

STUDIES ASSESSMENT CONTEMPORARY HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES Dylan Stone Year 12- 2015 INTRODUCTIONWhat are human rights? WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS?    “Human rights are entitlements that are fundamental. They are things to which every human being is entitled just because they are human”. All people have a claim to human rights as they are fundamental in ensuring peace and security for all peoples. They cannot be ‘given’ by governments, instead they are an inherited set of rights which automatically belong…

Words 7303 - Pages 30

Cjus141-1203b-09 Essay

defendant in question. I will explain the constitutional safeguards that would help the defendant for not taking the stand, as well as the theories of punishment that would apply to this case and why they apply to this example. 1. At what stage in the criminal justice process does double jeopardy attach itself to proceedings? Why? Explain. The follow is a direct excerpt from the Crime and justice in America E-book, “Jeopardy attaches at a defendant’s trial when the jury is empaneled or, in non-jury case…

Words 2213 - Pages 9

Bedford Case Study

prostitution laws in Canada. To start, according to Lowman and Louie (2012) prostitution law reform in Canada gained a renewed sense of urgency in September 2010, when the Superior Court of Justice for Ontario struck down the Criminal Code sections prohibiting communicating in public for the purpose of buying or selling sex (s 213), bawdy houses (s 210), and living on the avails of prostitution of another person (s 212.(1)(j)) on the grounds that they violate several Charter rights, including a…

Words 1280 - Pages 6

Basic Legal Concepts

Meaning of Law Law: A set of rules, imposed on all members of a community, which are officially recognised, binding and enforceable by persons or organisations such as the police and court. * Customs, Rules and Law * Customs: * Established patterns of behaviour among people in a society or group. * Depends on culture, religion and history. * Customary Law: Customs that have become laws. E.g. Australian Torres Strait Islander Laws, English and International Customary Laws. *…

Words 7588 - Pages 31

The Nature Of Crime

act or omission of a duty that results in harm to society and which is punishable by the state. b) The elements of a crime. Actus Reus: the guilty act. This is the voluntary commission of an act or voluntary omission of a duty that breaks the law. Important features are: Act or omission actually took place Done by the accused person That it was voluntary. Mens Rea: the guilty mind. This means that the person must have committed the act or omission with the intention to do so recklessly…

Words 9727 - Pages 39

Law Essay Media Rights 2015

Grade 12 Canadian and International Law Research Essay: The Media and Individual Privacy Many years ago the term “privacy” had little meaning to many people and especially in many court environments. Since this time, the world has established rules and regulations including privacy rights which act to serve and defend all human beings under the Charter Rights. The Canadian Justice system imposes protection and privacy for citizens dealing with the law. This essay will explore how the role…

Words 2828 - Pages 12

Assignment 1: Annotated Bibliography

Furthermore, both of these articles demonstrate that social values have evolved in response to changes in the law resulting in a society more aware of children’s entitlements and intolerant of any form of child abuse. An example of an international instrument ascended to by South Africa is the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child. Legislation enacted in South Africa to protect the rights of children is the Children’s Act 38 of…

Words 2773 - Pages 12