Physical restraint, such as holding an individual down, tying them to a chair, or physically preventing them from leaving a room. Verbal threats of force or coercion, such as threatening to physically restrain or punish the individual if they do not comply with instructions. Imposing restrictions on an individual's freedom of movement or liberty, such as confining them to a specific area, locking doors, or controlling access to resources. Using medication or sedation to control an individual's behavior or movements without their consent. Employing psychological or emotional manipulation to coerce or control the individual's actions or decisions. 3.2 Factors Making Restraint Lawful.
Restraint may be considered lawful under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 if certain factors are present, including: …show more content…
Proportionality: The level of restraint used is proportionate to the risk presented and is the least restrictive option available to achieve the desired outcome. Consent: Where possible, the individual has given informed consent to the use of restraint, or a valid decision-making process has determined that restraint is in their best interests. Compliance with legal requirements: Restraint is carried out in accordance with relevant legislation, policies, and procedures, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and associated safeguards. 3.3 Circumstances where Restraint Amounts to Deprivation of Liberty.
Restraint may amount to a deprivation of liberty when the individual is subjected to continuous or ongoing restrictions on their freedom of movement or liberty, and they are not free to leave or disengage from the situation. This may include circumstances