- Struggles within Metis identity formation o The Struggle of Metis Identity formation: Métis as a Nation and Indigenous Self-Determination
- Thesis = position yourself, state both sides of argument and your stance o 3-5 arguments supporting your thesis o The Struggle of Metis Identity formation: Métis as a Nation and Indigenous Self-Determination o Thesis: Within Canada in 2018, there is an evident need of acknowledgement within Indigenous self-determination. Nevertheless, with settler revisionism invading Indigenous (Métis specifically) community, their self-determination is especially vulnerable.
1. Need for Indigenous self-determination
a. Metis need for self-determination -Gaudry and Anderson
b. The idea of worldwide Indigenous …show more content…
Without this passing, the beginning of Métis self-determination would not be as strong as a message within society. However, even though the Métis are recognized as Indigenous peoples now, their need for freedom within their self-determination is still evident. Within the Daniels Decision, it is found that one issue holding back Métis self-determination is the idea of the growth of supposedly new Métis groups, such as the Mikinak Tribe of Québec, who see the Daniels Decision as an opportunity to capitalize on the perceived benefits of being Indigenous in Canada. These developments of the Métis community need to be understood and used from a policy stand point as blocks to build the affirmation of Métis nationhood and the self-determining power of the Métis Nation to define who we and they are. Canadians need to take the Métis peoples and their identity, and need for self-determination seriously in order for the Métis self-determination to …show more content…
Although, this research paper focuses on Canadian Indigenous identity, it is important to reach out to other sources of information to get a clear understanding of the idea of self-determination within the entire world today. Corntassel opens with the idea of self-determination, he states that it has become clearer within society that the existing rights discourse can only take Indigenous self-determination so far within society today. Throughout the past thirty years, Indigenous self-determination claims have been outlined in four distinctive ways that threaten the futures of Indigenous communities. The first of four, is the rights-based discourse, resulting in the compartmentalization of Indigenous powers of self-determination by splitting questions of homelands and natural resources from those political/legal recognition of a limited indigenous autonomy within the existing outline of the host state(s). Secondly, in many cases the rights discourse has led to denial of the identities or very existence of Indigenous peoples residing within their communities. Third, the framing of rights as political and or legal entitlements has deemphasized