This page is for the Evaluator’s Use Only
MGT5000 Managing Organisational Behaviour: Assign 2 marking sheet (2015)
CRITERIA
F > 50%
C 50 – 64%
B 65 – 74%
A 75 – 84%
HD 85%<
Mark
Content Weighting: 80%
Understanding and interpretation of assignment question:
Inadequate understanding & interpretation of questions/ misconception of the questions
Very basic understanding of the questions
Sufficient/satisfactory understanding and interpretation of questions
Very good understanding and interpretation of the questions
Unequivocal understanding and interpretation of questions
Mark out of 30
< 15
15 – 19
19 ½ – 22
22 ½ – 25
25 ½ – 30
Critical analysis
No evidence of critical analysis
Response relies on restating major themes from sources; little evidence of critical analysis
Some evidence of critical analysis
Critical analysis of sources/ critical appraisal of evidence and sources
Highly developed critical analysis and assessment of sources
Mark out of 20
< 10
10 – 12 ½
13 – 14 ½
15 – 16 ½
17 – 20
Research
Insufficient research/very limited sources/ sources used but not appropriate or relevant to the issue being discussed
Limited research on the relevant themes/ minimal effort to obtain original material evident/ relies on restating major themes from sources
Sufficient research is displayed on relevant themes/ evidence that original material obtained but little depth
Thorough research on the topic/ evidence of both original material and good effort to obtain relevant theoretical information
Display broad and in-depth research of the topic/ original material is the result of in depth investigation
Mark out of 15
<7 ½
7 ½ – 9
9 ½ – 11
11 ½ – 12 ½
13 – 15
Interpretation and application of theory
Incorrect or poor interpretation and application of theory
Marginal interpretation and application of theories
Adequate interpretation and application of theories
Clear and appropriate interpretation and application of theory
Excellent interpretation and application theories
Mark out of 15
<7 ½
7 ½ – 9
9 ½ – 11
11 ½ – 12 ½
13 – 15
Technical Weighting: 20%
Presentation
Written expression
Structure
Academic referencing
Poorly presented; Gross spelling & grammatical errors; No structure/no evidence of structure; Incorrect referencing
Average presentation of assignment; Basic understanding of rules of grammar however spelling and syntax, errors still occur; Some evidence of structure and progression in argument. Basic academic referencing
Well-presented assignment; Some evidence of fluency in writing, Sufficient structuring although internal problems may still be evident; Satisfactory level of referencing yet inconsistencies in referencing exist
Very good presentation; Clear and fluent writing/ clear structuring of ideas and paragraphing; Good structure; Very good referencing;
Excellent presentation; Well-constructed and crafted piece of work; a pleasure to read/ Excellent structure/Excellent and correct referencing throughout the assignment
Mark out of 20
<10
10 – 12 ½
13 – 14 ½
15 – 16 ½
17 – 20
Total marks out of 100
Evaluator’s comments:
Task 1 – The Scenario
Type your 500 word scenario here ….
Write in well-constructed paragraphs. Make sure you delete these sentences before you submit your assignment. Make sure also that you type your answer in 1.5 line spacing and justified - just as they appear in this sample of writing.
Tips about the word count: Tasks (1) and (2) have a combined word limit of 2,000 words (excluding the list of references). Plus, the table of recommendations (task 3) cannot exceed 2 pages. You will notice that this template already contains over 400 words in instructions and tips which you need to delete before you submit. The
