Michael J. Sandel's Justice: The Right Thing To Do

There has been rising contention regarding the issue of whether differences in the opinions of individuals in the public domain should be valued. An excerpt from Michael J. Sandel’s book entitled Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? fundamentally asserts that for the sake of the common good, citizens should openly address moral disagreements on matters of public policy. Indeed, society must encourage candid public discourse on moral and religious matters in order to uphold the American right to freedom of speech, which reflects what it means to live in an American democracy, and promote the welfare all. Sandel’s thesis demonstrates a sound understanding of every American citizen’s constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression. As a nation comprised of a diverse population inevitably with different opinions and viewpoints, the United States is responsible for leading the world in preserving its essential values of democracy: freedom, liberty, and justice for all. The founding fathers of the United States who lived in the late eighteenth-century focused on creating a nation that enabled for all …show more content…
By willingly choosing to address each other’s differences in opinion towards moral and religious matters in a just way, society is able to grow and create immense change. This has been demonstrated in the civil rights period of American history. Although it was a period of violence and intense societal division, the continual attempts by African-Americans and whites to address topics such as segregation and equal rights led to unprecedented reforms such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed racial discrimination and prejudice, and forever changed the lives of all

Show More

Michael J. Sandel's Justice: The Right Thing To Do

Related Documents: Michael J. Sandel's Justice: The Right Thing To Do

solum law Essay