Mill Utilitarianism

Words: 760
Pages: 4

To what extent is utilitarianism helpful in living a truly moral life?
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill which applies the principle of utility to moral problems. This utility refers to the extent to which good and evil are done by choice. The theories of Bentham and Mill are consequentialist, seeing goodness as being about happiness, well-being or pleasure.
Making moral decisions is something every human being does throughout life. How we live has an impact on others. Not just whether we are kind or unpleasant to the people we meet, but also in terms of the sort of relationships we cultivate, the behaviours we adopt or avoid and the principles we choose to live by. Our moral decisions are
…show more content…
Moreover, it allows people’s gut morality to be used more than being too legalistic. However, the results of actions are hard to predict, meaning that good intentions often result in bad outcomes. This, therefore, flaws this ethics as people who are bad at predicting outcomes will make many bad mistakes, possibly damaging society.
Bentham says ‘it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong’. It can be argued that the principle of utility would prove very useful for guiding the law towards what many of us today would defend as uninfringeable human rights. In a modern context, we can observe what is being imposed in North Korea and hypothesise that a utilitarian approach would lead to an obviously positive outcome. This would only be the case if the lack of freedom that many are subjected to is not what they
…show more content…
By way of contrast, religious moral teachings could contradict one another, leading to ambiguity. An example of this issue is present in the comparison of the Bible as propositional revelation and a liberal approach to Christian ethics from the theologians Paul Tillich and Joseph Fletcher. The legalistic approach offered by The Ten Commandments could be seen as too rigid for Fletcher who claimed that agape love is the only ruling norm. Therefore, it might not be clear for a Christian how to approach moral dilemmas such as abortion and euthanasia, meaning that utilitarianism provides a clear approach which is not affected by