The first source teaches me more about the vision Constantine saw and the Battle of Milvian Bridge. The article is entitled “The Battle of Milvian Bridge and the History of the Book,” and was written by Julie Christenson. Julie Christenson is a Graduate Teaching Assistant at the University of Missouri. She works …show more content…
Richard Cavendish is a historian who studies Britain’s historic heritage. He currently writes for the magazine History Today. He is a well-known author of several books, including “Kings and Queens: The Concise Guide,” and also edits guidebooks for Britain. The article I found is in the online version of History Today. History Today states that all of their articles are carefully edited. The article appeared to be factual without opinion. This source is recent, as it was published in 2012. This article can be found …show more content…
The story of this vision is that before Constantine marched his army to the Milvian Bridge for battle, he saw a cross in the sky and beneath it was written “in this sign conquer”. According to Richard Cavendish, while many people think this vision to be true, the earliest story of the battle written in 313 AD doesn’t even mention the vision. Another early story describes Constantine’s vision as a dream. In this dream God told him to use the cross against his enemies. According to the story Constantine marked his soldier’s shields with the cross. Again there is no proof of this story. Julie Christenson seems to agree with this. Eusebius, a Roman historian, does not talk about the vision in Historia Ecclesiatica, but later, in his Life of Constantine, the story of Constantine’s vision was added. It is doubtful that Constantine actually had a