has a right to monitor and confine. This has been shown in a number of Circuit of Appeals cases concerning schools and threats of internet violence. They have repeatedly ruled in favor of the schools in these cases. In my opinion, thus, the United States has the power to monitor, and should monitor, any cases where clear and present danger is applicable. School Bullying and terroristic threats should be monitored within our government. Every possible threat should be monitored, but only when they are determined to be threats. The cases about monitoring simple advocates of free speech are wrong. It's that clear and simple. Only threats that are solid and determined should be monitored, since they present a clear and present danger for our national security. In the end, a small abridging of constitutional rights is worth it for any number of securities stopped within our national borders. In the end, that's all that really matters. Safety, and non-prosecution for private acts, must be maintained above all else. That is what matters for the national government, all defined by the previous court cases enumerated above in this essay. Plus the general constitutional powers as