Moral Panic

Words: 2088
Pages: 9

Crime is a construct of a human being. It is the outcome of a range of factors, over hundreds of thousands over years, that have accumulated to become what crime is known as today. Even so, how crime is seen to each individual will vary from person to person. While there is a wide range of debate about what is considered ‘crime’, popular opinions derive from the claim that crime is a social and political construct. Social influence has come together to greatly shape individual perception through social norms and conformity. Over time, certain perceptions of crime are widely perpetuated throughout society and can become the general consensus. Furthermore, political influence has a similar effect due to power and authority being able to sway public opinion. Cohen’s theory of ‘moral panic’ is …show more content…
Influences of society and political agendas are undeniable, as they shape how crime is seen and portrayed. Whether negative or positive, moral panics have the capability of demonstrating how society is able to quickly change perceptions and initiate changes which are enforced by policy makers. Claiming that crime is a construct does not diminish certain behaviours of harm as objective realities. Rather, it acknowledges how these objective realities have arisen through social, political and also cultural factors. This is how they have become universally applicable. The media further plays an important role in establishing perceptions of crime in the public, which can perpetuate certain stereotypes of criminals in society. It is also crucial not to disregard other approaches to crime, such as positivism, which focus on biological explanations of crime, something that moral panics fail to address. Ultimately, moral panics demonstrate the complexity of crime, and how a multitude of factors must be considered and intertwined in order to understand crime. Crime is not always as straightforward as it