Essay on Morality and Animal Rights Theory

Submitted By King_mars23
Words: 1000
Pages: 4
Open Document
University of Phoenix Material

Thesis Statement and Outline

What is your thesis statement? My thesis statement concerns about ethics and morality also extend to matters associated with the treatment of animals. The purpose of this discussion is to summarize and critique several different theories associated with the ethical treatment of animals.

I. Introduction: Ethics and morality have consistently been topics of concern in our society. Concerns about ethics and morality also extend to matters associated with the treatment of animals. The purpose of this discussion is to summarize and critique several different theories associated with the ethical treatment of animals. The discussion will focus on the treatment of animals as it relates to hunting and trapping animals, eating animals, using animals for research, and the manner in which domestic and wild animals are treated. The research will summarize and critique four theories including anthropocentrism, Animal Liberation, Strong Animal Rights Theory, and Weaker animal rights theory.
II. Anthropocentrism
A. Definition
1. The belief that human beings are the central.
2. The assessment of reality through an exclusively human perspective.
B. How Anthropocentrism theory asserts
1. Animals are not human they do not possess logic.
2. They should not be treated in a manner that is logical or human.
III. Animal liberation
A. How it posits.
1. Non-human animals should be given the same consideration as humans.
2. It relates to their right to live and be free of torment.
B. Defined
1. The rights of animals to be protected from exploitation and abuse by humans
2. The right to humane treatment claimed on behalf of animals, especially the right to be treated as persons or more like persons under the law.
IV. Strong Animal Rights Theory A. How it asserts
1. That every normal mammal over a year of age has the same rights as human beings.
2. that is all mammals have the same right to live or die as humans do.
B. The three stages
1. The first stage asserts that mature mammals are both conscious and also have other mental abilities (Warren). These abilities are inclusive of memory emotion, belief, desire, intentional actions and an awareness of the future.
2. The second stage of this theory asserts that subjects of a life are independent of one another. This argument is used to refute the idea that utilitarianism which asserts that living things are only vessels of morally significant value (Warren). As such damage done to one living thing may be permissible because it may provide some benefit to other living things. This is that argument used to justify using animals for medical research.
3. The third stage of the theory asserts that because living things have inherent value they mustn’t be harmed. The third stage of the theory further asserts that there are moral rights attributed to things with inherent value. This means not only should living things not be harmed but human being should intervene or come to the assistance of other living organisms when they are in danger of being harmed (Warren).
V. Weaker Animal Right Theory
A. What this theory argues about
1. Any living organism that has the capacity to pursue certain satisfactions also has a right not to be forced to live without being able to pursue such satisfactions (Warren).
2. Also argues that any living organism that has the capacity to feel pain and hurt should have the right to live without having pain or hurt inflicted upon it unless there is a persuasive reason to argue the contrary. B. What it asserts
1. A general rule living things that can pursue satisfaction.
2. Feel pain have a right to exist without being denied the ability to pursue satisfaction or have pain forced upon them.
VI. Anthropocentrism Anthropocentrism views human being as the center of the universe and regards the world
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on Morality and Animal Rights Theory

Charles Darwinian Ethics Research Paper

For millennia humans have contemplated the rules for right and wrong and good and bad. There seems to be a sort of underlying code for this behavior ingrained in us, and despite numerous cultural differences there are many similarities in this code across all humans in the world. Various origins have been proposed to explain the source of morality, such as divine (divine command theory) or derived from human reason (Aristotelian ethics). Some of the best minds in history have dedicated their lives…

Words 1057 - Pages 5

Cultural Relativism: A Theory Of Ethical Action

surroundings, our parents and elders have instilled in us a fundamental awareness of what is right and wrong. It is actually an inherent trait of all humans and grows from our desire to get along well with each other in order to live a peaceful life. To achieve this way of life we understand that we must do to other people what we expect them to do to us in return. We try very hard to do what we feel and see as the right things to do in certain situations. This is the foundation of ethics. They are rules…

Words 1879 - Pages 8

Review Notes Phil102 L1L2 Essay

statement true? •Ethics-What makes an action right, or a person good? Is morality objective or subjective? Is it ever acceptable to lie? Is euthanasia moral? •Logic-What does it mean for some statements to follow from others? What structure makes an argument valid? -So say someone has amnesia What he likes and doesn’t like What he wants to do with his life What kid of person he wants to be Morality? Ethical stand point? What is Morality for? To keep society from falling apart To…

Words 480 - Pages 2

Ethics Final Essay

Ethics Final Essay’s 1. I would describe my approach to morality generally as nonconsequentalist. Nonconsequentalist moral theories suggest that the rightness of an action depends primarily or completely, on the nature of the action itself. The example you gave in class about being up for a promotion along with another coworker and lying about that coworker so you were the one promoted follows this theory. Lying about that person was for you to achieve your own personal goal. There were consequences…

Words 757 - Pages 4

Divine Command Theory Essay

Divine Command Theory is a meta-ethical view that claims morality is dependent on religion. Hence, for this theory we should assume a divine being, such as God, to exist. For this essay we shall just assume for one God to exist. He would then act as a foundation for the creation of, not only the physical, but morality as well. His will then decides if something can be morally right or wrong e.g. something is morally right if command by God or morally wrong if forbidden by God. For example, Christians…

Words 1618 - Pages 7

John Locke Research Paper

the liberal theory of justices, John Locke contractor from the theory of libertarianism, and Immanuel Kant argued that our action has more worth if the precisely our capacity by rising above self-interest and inclination and to act out of duty, while John Rawle argue that theory of justice as fares is what describes a society in which all citizen holds equal basic right and liberties in order to cooperation with in an egalitarian economics system. The basic principle of liberal theory of justice…

Words 1036 - Pages 5

Teleological Theory Of Ethics

therefore making the nut & also not caring about what the right & what the wrong however what would get them ahead. Deontology has been opposed to the teleological theories in that goal of moral behavior has been achievement of few good or the advantage state of the affairs for self or also for the others. For the deontologists, end of the moral action has been varying performance of that . The Deontological theory also denies that the right & the wrong have been in the few way or also the other…

Words 318 - Pages 2

Utilitarianism and Ultimate Moral Principle Essay

namely, the Principle of Utility. This principle requires us, in all circumstances, to produce the most happiness that we can. 2. To understand why the Principle of Utility was so radical, we have to appreciate what it leaves out of morality: Gone are all references to God or to abstract moral rules “written in the heavens “. Morally is no longer conceived ha faithfulness to some divinely given code or some set of inflexible rules. 3. The Utilitarian’s were, as I said, social…

Words 351 - Pages 2

Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care Essay

Fried Pataters Mr. Hahn Phil 2310 10 May 2010 Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care Aristotle and Rita Manning both have different theories when it comes to ethics. Aristotle uses virtue ethics to answer questions about morality whereas Manning uses what is called ethics of caring to do the same thing. Virtue ethics claims people’s actions aim towards the highest good of happiness. From happiness, moral virtue stems from reasons governing the desires of the soul. Manning on the other hand believes…

Words 2363 - Pages 10

Pathos Analysis

Thomas Alan Silvidi English Composition II 26 February 2024 Pathos Prevails When people step into a grocery store and put their favorite animal products in their cart, most do not consider the implications and consequences of their purchase. Many attempt to bring awareness to the controversy through arguments over the morality, benefits, and dangers of the animal agriculture industry. Some take a scientific approach, detailing specifics and data points, whereas others focus more on ethical and philosophical…

Words 1597 - Pages 7