They go on by suggesting that sentencing an inmate to death is more cost efficient than keeping them imprisoned to carry out the remainder of their life. Also, because of the possibilities of the inmate escaping, or nevertheless murdering again, Mull and Stewart believe that the death penalty is the best thing to do to refrain this from happening. In the last paragraph of the article the authors state: “I believe that there are some defendants who have earned the ultimate punishment our society has to offer by committing murder with aggravating circumstances present” (Mull and …show more content…
This claim contradicts the argument that the authors are trying to prove. What this is saying is that two people can commit the exact same crime, and depending on where the crime took place one person may get the death penalty and the other may only get Life in Prison. This is yet another reason why the death penalty is an inadequate form of punishment. Additionally, the authors suggest that the death penalty is rarely carried out, however according to the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 1,418 executions in the United States since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976. Of these legal executions, 1,512 took place in the Southern region of the Nation, also known as the Bible belt ("Facts about the Death Penalty"). As most of this region identifies with Christianity we should take the sixth commandment of the Holy Bible into consideration: “Thou shall not