Christopher Bartneck, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita question the validity of the uncanny valley in "My Robotic Doppelgänger - A critical Look at the Uncanny Valley." Through previous studies, they concluded that humans are able to judge a person "that people often make important judgments within seconds of meeting a person" (Bartneck, Kanda, Ishiguro, Hagita 271). They believed that this period of judgment would apply to robots. They conducted a study that measured likeability of humans and human-like machines. Their study concluded that participants could instantly tell if they were interacting with a machine or human. However, contrary to Mori's uncanny valley hypothesis, there was no significant decrease in likeability between the humans and the machines. They hypothesize that "there really could be no difference between the likability of humans and that of androids" or that "participants might have used different standards to evaluate the likeability of human and the androids" (Bartneck, Kanda, Ishiguro, Hagita 274). These scientists concluded that likeability is a very complex