He states
“you will understand war much better if you think of it, not simply as strife come to a head, but rather as a disease, or perversion of communion. Modern war characteristically requires a myriad of constructive acts for each destructive one: before each culminating blast there must be a vast network of interlocking operations, directed communally” (RM, 22).
Worldview, as O’Gorman presents it, is an example of war as a “perversion of communion.” Worldviews, at least in the sense that O’Gorman uses the term in Spirits of the Cold War, “are embedded in ways of speaking and being. Indeed, once solidified in speech, worldviews can become objects exterior to the self: objects of commitment, discipline, devotion, and aspiration (O’Gorman, xii). The image of worldview that O’Gorman provides is one in which ways of being in the world aspire to a myth of unity. Containment, massive retaliation, liberation, and deterrence all have as their goal a certain mythic image of a type of unity. In a world in which division is so deeply ingrained, especially the world at the time of the Cold War where division drove foreign policy in both America and the Soviet Union, leaders’ worldviews did not aspire all the way to the myth of perfect unity. They did, however, reach towards that