Throughout the centuries there has been a long period of history where art and artifacts have been stolen or acquired. Back in 1825 Napoleon removed thousands of art around where removed and no particular place had protection from raiding churches, historic building, and museums who possessed rare artifacts were looted for the acquiring of these objects who were either kept or sold and distributed all across the world. But Napoleon raids did not compare to that of world war two Europe was ransacked again and nazis attacked 427 museums this art was sold to collectors destroyed or hidden away only to turn up decades layers in some of the most popular museums. But those looting instances happened quite some time ago, more recently during the attack on Baghdad in 2003 the national Iraqi museums was desecrated hundreds of objects were taking deep down into the black market. Even in these instances not always are these …show more content…
Further, In 1863 The president Abraham Lincoln set out a treaty to discourage and ban the looting of southern museums and the protection of their cultural property. Moreover In 1907 the Hague convention amid to eliminate and make illegal wartime plunder and make wartime plunder the subject of legal action. Furthermore there has been some actions to take make illegal the forcefulness of plunder. Even with countries are fighting museums and expressing that there is a less violent way of plundering and that would be archeological digs and