Neoliberalism

Words: 577
Pages: 3

Throughout different stages of history, we have seen many events that have hindered, but also restored human rights. From feudalism to the capitalistic era, the elite have always strong-armed the lower class. I will show how Mexican elites and global capitalists, have managed to reap power over the poor; and thus stripped the poor from their human rights. Neoliberalism is often argued to be the answer to help increase human well-being. However, a key component of its doctrine can be disputed. Liberalization, which basically means ‘freeing’, does not in fact liberate in terms of human rights. It may liberate markets and thus create more wealth for nations, but how does that help the people? Donnelly argues that the the plea and promise of human rights is a …show more content…
If an economic system that brings wealth to society also hurts the poor, is it really progressing and increasing human well-being? Or does it only do so for the rich? One of the many rights that every person is entitled to is the right to life, liberty and security of person. However, neoliberalism interferes with this right when it strong-arms the poor from attaining their life to liberty. Their freedom is restricted when inequality grows and drives them into poverty. Inequality and poverty, concerns for civil society groups for a while now has become a major concern for society (Teichman, 68). I think if we ask the poor, they would say that the welfare state was better for society as it believed in human rights, and operated based on the foundations to help the citizens of their country. However, with the emergence of neoliberalism, the state had very little involvement and thus the lower class of Mexico dealt with extreme inequality. For generations now we have learned that anarchy is terrible for society. Although neoliberalism does not entail anarchy, it operates and requires there to be very little government