If an economic system that brings wealth to society also hurts the poor, is it really progressing and increasing human well-being? Or does it only do so for the rich? One of the many rights that every person is entitled to is the right to life, liberty and security of person. However, neoliberalism interferes with this right when it strong-arms the poor from attaining their life to liberty. Their freedom is restricted when inequality grows and drives them into poverty. Inequality and poverty, concerns for civil society groups for a while now has become a major concern for society (Teichman, 68). I think if we ask the poor, they would say that the welfare state was better for society as it believed in human rights, and operated based on the foundations to help the citizens of their country. However, with the emergence of neoliberalism, the state had very little involvement and thus the lower class of Mexico dealt with extreme inequality. For generations now we have learned that anarchy is terrible for society. Although neoliberalism does not entail anarchy, it operates and requires there to be very little government