In Norman’s article statistics show “A majority (57%) of those younger than 30 are against the idea” (Norman). One argument could be that we don’t need more volunteers because 250,000 service opportunities are provided by Congress each year. Unfortunately, that is false because Congress didn’t honor its commitment to provide 250,000 national service opportunities each year through the Serve America Act. The second argument could be that there shouldn’t be mandatory service because it’s a free country. I disagree because in my opinion, one year of national service is minuscule and the choice is given to serve the year from ages 18 to 28. In their article, Lahey and Kanat prove my point by saying “It could be the military, volunteering in rural schools or hospitals, job retraining in regions with low employment, working in prisons, urban development, building community gardens, or environmental cleanup. There are dozens of options. You can do it after high school, during a college gap year, or upon graduating. You can do it near home or in another state” (Lahey & Kanat). Another reason I disagree is because service has proved to be beneficial. For example in their article, Dionne and Drogosz say “Service learning, increasingly popular in our public schools, has been linked with a heightened sense of civic responsibility and personal effectiveness” (Dionne &