What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? The circumstances in which a pocket veto might be seen as a strategic move by a President is when they are avoiding unpopular legislation because if a bill passed by Congress is controversial, a president may choose to employ a pocket veto to avoid directly vetoing the bill which would provoke backlash from the public or Congress. Another circumstance where a 'pocket veto' might be seen as a strategic move by a president is to send a message to Congress. This can be used as a signaling tool to convey dissatisfaction or disagreement with Congress. The political implications of such action could be congressional reactions, which is that Congress may view a pocket veto as a sign of executive overreach or even as a challenge to legislative authority. This could strain the relations between the executive and legislative branches and lead to increased tension and conflicts. Another political implication that such action could be is public perception, which is that the public may interpret a pocket veto differently based on the specific bill. For example, if the bill in question is widely supported by the public, a pocket veto could be perceived as obstructionist or unresponsive to the public's needs. While the bill is unpopular, a pocket veto may be seen as a prudent decision by the president to protect the interests of the