Chaucer describes the characters with such detail to give the reader a better understanding of what people were like in the medieval times. Therefore after the reader is educated on what each character was like and how they were supposed to act like and what they were supposed to do. Chaucer begins to try to connect the dots for you on how society in the Medieval times was corrupt.
In the prologue he tells of a nun, prioress, and everyone know that nuns are supposed to give themselves up to God and be humble and only have in their possessions what they absolutely needed. However this nun was not exactly the prime example, as Chaucer describes she was flirty, rich, and loved attention which may I remind you is not what nuns in those times were supposed to act like. He describes her clothes as provocative, and very slim and fitting. She is descrided to not wear pannty hoes like she should have becuase bare skin was not acceptable. Most would see her and describe her as a modern day hoe and that is most likely what they thought of her in those times as well. …show more content…
Normally when you hear of a monk you envision a bald man in raggedy garments that is very godly and studies the bible for the most part of his day. However he is described as a man that likes to hunt and not study. He is said to dress very nicely, and is very tan and is very garnished. It describes him as fat, bald, big eyes, and all shiny with grease. This is another character that Chaucer uses to show how the medieval society was corrupt and broken. The monk just like the nun are supposed to be godly and only need what they have to have and give to the poor and this is not the case in The Canterbury