O. J. Simpsons Jury Analysis

Words: 1365
Pages: 6
Open Document
Historical background leads episode one back to major factors that will eventually determine the outcome of this saga. The series begins effectively with the dramatic actual archival film of the Rodney King beatings by Los Angeles Police, and the subsequent riots in the aftermath of the acquittal of the officers tried in the case. Established is the issue of race, in which through foreshadowing, will be tantamount in the Simpson trial, based on the egregious history of relations between the L. A. Police and the Black community. Opening the series with this negative legacy, sets the theme of the significance of race, and gives the series the documentary feel, before it transcends into the dramatic depictions of events.
Moving ahead two years …show more content…
J. Simpsons’ guilt. The lack of credibility of the key witnesses, the mishandled of the crucial blood evidence, and the timeline of the murders which was never specifically detailed or established. Every one of the actors in the portrayals of jurors’ realistic performances capturing the interplay and decision making that lead to the verdict. One factor despite all of the incriminating evidence against O. J., convinces me that he was guilty. It is the initial reaction to being informed of the murders, he never asks how Nicole was killed. Also, the police chase, with the passport and money consistent with a guilty person with the intention of escape, does not appear like a person that is innocent or falsely accused. Of course the possibility of his blood and the victim’s blood being placed in all the various settings is also highly unlikely. O. J. Simpson got away with murder, due to unbelievable circumstances all converging, and hopefully, after all of the other extraordinary events that have taken place subsequent to his acquittal, he will just fade into the sunset and live out the remainder of his life. I doubt
Show More

Related Documents: O. J. Simpsons Jury Analysis

Trial of O.J.Simpson Essay

Paper: OJ Simpson Trial Team C: Dwana Harris, Ian Mcguire, Ryan Raeffer, Andrew Cantrell, Renel Philippe, Aaron Pena CJA/224 October 7, 2013 Lou Wittmer Introduction The double-murder trial of O.J. Simpson is surely one that will live in infamy. From the controversial “If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit” phrase coined by his superstar attorney Johnnie Cochran to the jaw-dropping verdict of not guilty this case has made its mark in history. In 1994 Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ronald…

Words 2136 - Pages 9

Jeffrey Toobin Oj Simpson Defense Summary

Yorker. He took charge of writing an analysis of the OJ Simpson trial with the intent of analyzing the facts presented and how they changed the outcome of the trial. We can assume that he chose to take the lead on this article as it fell right under his expertise in the legal analysis field. This is a case that very few lawyers or analysts would take on because an author could easily display bias due to the fact that this is a very ethics and emotion based jury decision. This article Is also very…

Words 981 - Pages 4

The Importance Of Crime

Crime has always been a huge part of society. Developed or developing, every country has it’s own crime rate. Although prevention is better than cure, sometimes it is not possible. Mostly, the only instance that law enforcement personnel get wind of a crime, it has already been committed. Hence, solving crime cases has become an essential part in a countries governing system. As technology improves over the years, so do the tools law enforcement agencies have to fight crime. In the past, good detective…

Words 2334 - Pages 10

Corporation (Fisch) Outline Penn Law Essay

o Types of Firms: ▪ Sole Proprietorship- single owner firm ▪ Partnership- an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit ▪ Corporation- a special business form created…

Words 62789 - Pages 252