He believes that the notion of right and wrong comes from evolution and depends on individual’s minds, experience, and natural phenomena. for moral truth in the context of science. In order to prove his positions more effectively, he describes science as a value in business ethics while applying to the scientific values of understanding the world and logical consistency. To illustrate the content of morality in deeper understanding, Harris states that given all the circumstances relating to god, he states that it does not accomplish in lives of others and the care of human sufferings. From this point on, this arguer commits some major fallacies, mostly red herring, when he said that” there’s no good reason to believe that such a being exists. Look at the problem of evil and the problem of the unevangelized” to his opponents as it seems that Harris tries to divert the audience attention from the real problem regarding to the main argument topics of morality and making irrelevant statements about god. To wrap up his debate, he close his arguments with facts are what it remains for people in every knowledge that allows human beings to survive in this