8, of the U.S Constitution that specified the power of Congress, Congress would have had constitutional authority to define conspiracy as a war crime, however due to the incorporation of the law of war into the UMCJ, no treaty in the law of war specifies a rule over the offence of conspiracy and therefore, it could not be used as basis for prosecution. Following the findings that the military commission deemed illegal under the UMCJ, the focus was then moved to the understanding of whether Hamdan’s trial would also violate the Geneva Conventions, in which the court came to the decision that “Common Article 3 is applicable here and requires that Hamdan be tried by a “regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.” This was a puzzling decision by the court since Common Article 3 of the Convention refers to “cases of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the high contracting parties.” The Justice department found that Hamdan’s case was part of an international conflict and thus not applicable under the Article 3 of the Geneva convention, moreover the case could not fit into article 2 since al-Qaeda is not a state and can never become a high contacting party to the Geneva