Lack of campaign contributions creates, as L. Tucker Gibson said, a “philosophical and political battleground.” More money that one has results in greater possibilities of being appointed as judge for the upcoming six year term. Concernment with the “the impact of money on the impartiality, integrity, and independence of their judges” develops among the public (Domino). The decisions of selecting judges are affected by contributions. The obligation of contributions are to be neutral and unbiased. Due to the increase party competition and expensive cost of partisan campaigning, judges reluctant to have involvement with individual with the interest and intention to donate in result to influence high court and justice decisions (Domino). Candidates beneficial to corporation are more likely to receive donations (Collier). For instance, studies have analyzed the influence of money by the collection of data through the 1994 and 1998 elections. This lead up to $12.8 million in campaign funds in which more than half provided by lawyers and law firms