Pat Carlen, one of Britain’s most imaginative and innovative sociologist,has often been called a ‘feminist criminologist’ though maybe that is something of a misnomer since she always insists that she never has employed any body of feminist when doing sociological analysis.
This statement managed to clarify misunderstanding of Carlen’s studies.Carlen also deny herself as a criminologist yet rather as someone who get involved in sociological work as her concern in criminology is not merely for its own sake.Its rather as a element in sociology in overall and social exclusion specifically.Significantly,Carlen’s works have exerted extraordinary and significant influence on feminist,critical and …show more content…
The contrasting treatment of men and women in the criminal justice system can be distributed to two streams,leniency and harshness.Some concerned with leniency and ‘chivalry hypothesis’,believes women offenders are more likely to be treated leniently in accordance with their characteristics (Davies 2011).Alternatively, Cavadino and Dignan(2007) argue the occupancy of leniency continues sexist belief of women as weaker and less logical than men.
Carlen consider with the harsher treatment of female criminal ,compare with male criminals,suggest the women who fail to comply the criterion of traditional femininity are fit with the sexist prejudice.(Carlen 1983).The ‘evil women’ hypothesis claims women criminals are treated more harshly through a process of ‘double jeopardy’(Carlen 1988).For being a law breaker and also a deviant women.(Cavadino and Dignan 2007).(Carlen 1995)
Carlen develops four vital components for a more rational comprehension of women conviction.(carlen