It has been proven that schools will save money if they cut back on sports. By suspending sports, the author realized, the district could save $ 150,000 in one year (Ripley 10). For example, new bleachers can cost half a million dollars and maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year (Ripley 10). This shows that if …show more content…
By suspending sports, the author realized, the district could save $ 150,000 in one year (Ripley 10). For example, new bleachers can cost half a million dollars and manting a grass field can cost more than 20,000 dollars a year (Ripley 10). This shows that if schools got ride of sports they can save more than 170,000 dollars a year. Schools should not have sports because the school will save more money because they will not have to buy uniforms or a field of grass and they won’t have to spend money on benches.
The purpose of sports is to have a good time playing them, but when students play them their grades can be affected by them badly. Kids that play sports at school have fun playing sports, but when students play sports they could not focus on school which would could cause them to get bad grades. Therefore, schools should not have sports because it will save money and it will improve students’ grades.
Therefore, schools should not have sports because it will improve the student's grades, they will turn their assignments in on time, and focus better in class.
Schools should not have sports because they will concentrate better, their grades will go up, and the district will save money. If schools banned sports, they would have more money, because they would not have to buy sport gear.If schools didn’t have sports, the students will pay attention to the teacher and their work, causing their