The examination was directed at Stanford University on August 14–20, 1971, by a group of scientists drove by brain science educator Philip Zimbard. I would choose a combination of descriptive, explanatory; I would choose descriptive because Zimbard wanted to study and see how the prisoners and guards state of minds was and the meaning of descriptive is a “studies are often concerned with counting or documenting observations; exploratory studies focus more on developing a preliminary understanding about a new or unusual problem” (Maxfield, M.G., and Babbie, E., pg. 19, 2009). Secondly I chose explanatory because Zimbard and his researchers wanted to see why and how the changes between the guards and prisoners have changed since they got their and throughout his …show more content…
Detainees were given numbers keeping in mind the end goal to kind of dehumanize them as it were. Additionally, I would accept that the legitimacy of this examination is now traded off as it would be to a great degree hard to imitate his conditions, particularly given how far brain science has come as far as morals and member prosperity. As far as the dependability of his test I would expect this would respect numerous parts of his examination, for example, being a field test, it can be hard to control exploratory measures. This would infer that dependability is traded off in light of the fact that the estimation is not steady. Additionally, Zimbardo did impact the consequences of the examination, as he didn't just watch members and his discoveries may have well been the aftereffect of inclination, as it has been proposed that members did just inspire the reactions they thought Zimbardo needed to