The opposite side believes that governing a country without their approval is acceptable. In Document B, Albert Beveridge states the following in his campaign speech, “The opposition tells us that we ought to govern a people without their consent. I answer, The rule… that all just government derives its authority from the consent of the governed, applies only to those who are capable of self-government” (Document B). Beveridge is saying that the Philippines are not capable of governing themselves so America has to intervene in their government and save them from Spanish rule. Beveridge thinks that it is the United State’s duty to establish American civilization and government in the Philippines. The annexation of the Philippines is unjust behavior of America. In Document C, President William McKinley states four unreasonable arguments for annexing the Philippines. One of his arguments states “that we could not give (the Philippines) back to Spain ⎼⎼ that would be cowardly and dishonorable” (Document C). The justifications that the opposing side has for annexing the Philippines also include: by handing over the Philippines to France and Germany would be bad business on America’s part, the Philippines are unfit to govern themselves, and that it was America’s place to educate and Christianize the Filipinos. These purposes to annex the Philippines are wrongful …show more content…
The country that fought for its freedom, wanted to take the freedom from other countries. America should not have annexed the Philippines and let them become a independent country on their own and established their own way of government and life since the country just gained independence and freedom from Spain. The United States should have given the Philippines an opportunity to prosper into a strong country similar to how America had done itself. The reasons for annexing the Philippines were unjust and showed that the idea of imperialism was not