After reading Plato’s allegory of the cave, accuracy is the intellectual standard that I feel relate to this story. It is unclear what is existent or nonexistent to the things that they believed were true. Prior to the prisoner being removed out of darkness into the light, darkness was the prisoner’s light. The prisoner was not accurate about the shadows that were passing along the wall, until he was able to see them in light. Being accurate about the things he was able to identify, gave him knowledge that the other prisoners did have. Another intellectual standard that relate is breadth, because once the prisoners return to the cave he was unable to see the things that he once knew as reality. The others in the cave believed that what they knew as reality was true. But you have to understand both point of views, to be emerge in darkness for so long and then removed from darkness and placed in light. To understand what was, is totally different because light has been shed on it. But I question who’s to say, that what’s in darkness is not the truth and what the light shine on is a façade or