Plea Bargaining In Law

Words: 651

Pages: 3

Open Document

Plea Bargaining
Plea bargains are used to allow the prosecution and the defendant to negotiate for a guilty/no contest plea, reduction in or no incarceration time, and finally to have some charges dropped from the case completely. This pretrial activity is used in more than 90% of state and federal cases but not everyone agrees with the outcome.
Plea bargains are a useful in helping to relieve the strain on the District Attorney’s office who has and enormous case load. By pleading out the lesser crimes for probation or drug diversion they can then focus on more major crime cases. This allows supervision and treatment and could prevent more serious crimes from those individuals. It also helps to relieve the overcrowding in our jails that may in turn prevent violent criminals early release. This can also have an adverse effect by allowing career criminals walk with lesser charges. When career offenders know the system they can use a plea bargain to escape more serious charges. Some instances criminals use their drug addiction as a means to plead guilty do a drug offence so they can get drug diversion instead of incarceration. This allows the criminal to remain on the streets and open to commit more crime until apprehended again.
A plea bargain can also be used to secure a conviction. In a …show more content…
Law enforcement put a lot of time in and effort in apprehending suspects. Not to mention they put their lives in harm’s way to keep communities safe. I close to a case with a killer being offered a deal to take the death penalty off the table if he provided information. The information was for the location of Amber Duboid body and a confession. Amber was my coworker’s daughter and this case was very close to home as I have five daughters myself. I would have like to see John Albert Gardner III die for his crimes but the plea deal stopped

Commonwealth V. Battis In The 1800's

Plea Bargain Origins In the early days of English common law, courts would hear several cases per day and make a decision. This decision would be made without having lawyers present. As time went on lawyers were added to trials and the process significantly slowed. Increases in criminal activity meant more and more cases to potentially go to trial. With trials continually adding up and no increase in prison facilities to house the guilty, courts had to decide whether to allow defendants to plead…

Words 975 - Pages 4

Arguments Against Plea Bargaining

are considering a bill that bans all plea-bargaining in our state. As a leading expert on plea-bargaining, I’m aware of the instrumental role that it plays in our justice system. From the outset, I would like to state my definitive position on the matter: that plea bargaining should not be banned. My following testimony will support this position. The Stakeholders and How a Plea-Bargaining Ban Will Affect Them The stakeholders who benefit from plea-bargaining include judges, prosecutors, defense…

Words 477 - Pages 2

Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

Plea bargaining is a relief for the criminal justice system. If it did not exist the criminal justice system would become bogged down with defendants waiting for months and years to go to trial, not allowing individuals their Constitutional right to a speedy trial. Without plea bargaining, the courts, prosecutors, public defenders, and judges would no longer be able to handle their cases by taking them to trial because their time and resources would be limited. There are various reasons of the…

Words 340 - Pages 2

Dual Court System Essay

system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in…

Words 1073 - Pages 5

Plea Bargaining

Plea Bargaining CJA/224 March 14, 2013 Plea Bargaining We have all gone to the super market and used their express checkout lane in the hopes of getting in and out in a hurry. But something most of the general public is unaware of is that the American Criminal Court System has its own version of the express check-out lane. Plea Bargaining is the criminal courts systems version of an express check-out, and ninety five percent of the people who are channeled through the criminal…

Words 1385 - Pages 6

Plea Bargaining In Court Cases

The court component of the justice system is normally viewed as an adversarial system of law between the prosecution and defense presided by a judge. In a criminal trial, the goal is to bring the procedure to a successful close with adversarial framework. Historically, prosecutors present cases and argue to prove a defendant is culpable for a crime. Prosecutors represent the people and are involved in all phases of the court proceedings. It is the job of a prosecutor to secure a conviction. Defense…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Criminal Justice System Analysis

police, the courts, and corrections. All three components have many different daily duties and responsibilities. Police Officers and Law Enforcement Agencies are typically the most informed in detail due to them having the knowledge of the incident itself that put the “accused” in the position to be apprehended. When reports of a crime have been made the Police or Law Enforcement Agency of that jurisdiction must conduct the investigation. When conducting investigations there are many factors to consider…

Words 2123 - Pages 9

Court Issues Analysis Essay

n.d.). Language interpretation services have slightly been ignored in the past, that’s why in the future we need to be more prepared and aware that we have a very diverse culture and many people these days cannot speak English. Victim rights laws have a huge impact on court…

Words 1164 - Pages 5

Truth In Sentencing Laws Deter Crime

B CJA/204 November 26, 2012 Deana Bohenek Truth-In-Sentencing Debate Opening Argument Truth-in-sentencing laws do not deter crime. The federal truth-in-sentencing law guarantees that certain violent offenders will serve at least 85% of their sentence (Schmalleger, 2012). However, if the offender acts accordingly in prison, he or she can attain parole for good behavior. What about the…

Words 1917 - Pages 8

Criminal Justice Assignment

References Bohm, R.M. (Producer). (2018, January 02). Principles of criminal justice. [Unit 1, Outline #1]. Podcast retrieved from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net/cps/default.aspx?SectionID=6579&tabid=155#1 Gilchrist, G. M. (2016). Trial Bargaining. Iowa Law Review, 101(2), 609-656. Everyone has the desire to co-exist among others behaving pleasantly. People do not always behave accordingly. The criminal justice system reacts to behaviors once the behavior is considered criminal (Bohm, 2018)…

Words 641 - Pages 3