The film takes you through the best argument against the disease theory – that the addict has the freedom of choice when given sufficient motivation not to drink or use. Surely addiction is a behaviour, not a disease like diabetes or cancer? Early on in the film he counters these arguments with his own medical opinion: addiction is a disease of choice. In other words, addiction is a dysfunction …show more content…
At the beginning of the film Dr McCauley says “I wonder what it would be like if I could wander through the brain like I can hike through Utah? The brain has bumps and grooves, the same way this land has mountains and canyons.” Initially this felt like a bit of a stretch but by the end of the film it made sense and helped bring all the ideas together.
As a fellow addict, I could never understand why I did such stupid things at the exact moment when I should have been at my most responsible. Providing one of the key conclusions of the film, McCauley proves that relapse is an unconscious process brought on by certain chemicals in the brain which reacts to stress and the altered survival settings that drugs and alcohol create.
He gives a logical and scientific explanation for exactly why addiction happens: the process, the chemistry and yes, hope of a solution through recovery. By understanding the things that have caused the damage, we can alter our lives and allow our damaged organ to heal. But this requires professional help, certainly in most cases, and a caring environment where a programme of treatment can be developed for the patient -- and continued towards permanent recovery through abstinence.
- See more at: