“Exploring the grounds of the moral judgements and the nature of the beings who make them” is where …show more content…
To state that it is inhumane to seek a “comprehensive balance sheet of pleasure and pain” is not entirely correct because pleasure and pain are one of the most basic reactions of both animals’ and humans’ nature to ensure survival(263). To deem a species inhumane with that reason, it can be argued that human have inhumane natures as well. Given that some animals cannot think in a complex manner, but the fact that they do have to follow ‘codes of conduct’ to survive cannot be refuted. When hurt or in danger, both expresses fear: running, screaming, screeching, howling, wailing, squealing, and so so much more. To create intersecting relationship between what it means to be humane, “wishes to promote kindness and to oppose cruelty” and give paradoxical statements of what humane beings’ duties and obligations are, is self-contradictory when animals have to go through the pain and displeasure as the all time humane way to essentially promote ‘kindness’, which is the incorrect term to use here because one is only perpetuating an illusion of kindness (263). Putting it in another way, one must advocate for animals to suffer and go through pain to be benevolent. But wait, a factor of “humane” is also to fight against cruelty. It does not make sense at all to say that being humane is being beastly