Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

Words: 743

Pages: 3

Open Document

Charles R. Swindoll once said, “Prejudice is a learned trait. You’re not born prejudiced; you’re taught it. In the modern drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the story tells about 12 jurors in a room together who are tasked with deciding the verdict on a murder charge against a 19 year old for murdering his father. As evidence and arguments come to light, the twelve juror’s personalities clash as they choose on this final verdict. Twelve Angry Men demonstrated not only that life lesson on prejudice during the text, but also a lesson on how respectfulness to one another will win you respect back, two relevant and important life roles for anyone at any age.
One of the most important lessons a person can know is that prejudice, in any form, will only lead to biased thoughts about another that when you get to …show more content…
A fine example of this is in the text, as jurors #3, #7, and especially #10 decided the accused may have killed his father, because he came from a poor social class. They believed that because he came from the slums, he had more tendencies towards violence. After another vote to determine which side the majority is on, #10 stated, “Human life don’t mean as much to them as it does to us. Look, these people are drinking and fighting all time, and if somebody gets killed, so somebody gets killed. They don’t care.”(Rose 27). Juror #10s bigoted opinions were based on his experience because he “lived among ‘em all my life” (Rose 5). These judgmental beliefs were shared by juror #4, as he exclaimed that “The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” (Rose 8) These two jurors, #4 and #10s one sided view of a group of people, enforcing a characteristic on them simply because of how much money they had

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

impartial trial. Due Process is central to the plot of “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose. In the story 12 jury members are faced with the murder trial of a young man, accused of killing his father. One of the purposes of the play is to expose the prejudices that are brought into the courtroom by a jury. In the 1997 the defendant is portrayed as a Latino man. It is revealed that he lives in the slums of New York. Many racial and socioeconomic prejudices that play into the jurors’ verdicts. Juror #10 often…

Words 581 - Pages 3

Personal Experiences And Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Personal experiences can affect our feelings and sometimes cause prejudice. In our legal court system the defendant has civil rights which allow him/her to be dealt with impartial hearing. In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose presents us with a case in which a juror feels bad for the culprit which ultimately leads to the jurors declaring him not guilty. I believe that personal feelings are tied into the final fate of that suspect. An example of personal feelings overshadowing the real issue…

Words 477 - Pages 2

12 Angry Men And How To Kill A Mockingbird Comparative Essay

During both stories, Twelve Angry Men and How To Kill A Mockingbird, it is evident that prejudice affects what people say, think, and do. Between both, they’re prejudices are very similar. Reginald Rose and Nelle Harper Lee’s works will both be compared in this essay to prove that prejudice clouds reasonable thoughts and makes people show anger against others. Some people have short tempers, they get annoyed and angry easily. These people often get mad when they are offended. When this happens,…

Words 765 - Pages 4

To Kill A Mockingbird And 12 Angry Men Essay

Mockingbird and Twelve Angry Men demonstrate that prejudice can effectively prevent the pursuit of justice? In the two texts Harper Lee’s novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” and Reginald Rose’s play “Twelve Angry Men”, both portray how racism, peer pressure, and prejudice can easily change the views and beliefs of others. In the texts, the authors show how the jury are prejudice, the way white people treat coloured people, and how both the protagonists in the two text are not affected by racial prejudice. Both…

Words 737 - Pages 3

To Kill A Mockingbird Pride And Prejudice Analysis

The impact of prejudice and strict social conventions on characters in harper lee's to kill a mocking bird and Reginald roses twelve angry men are unfair to society and the individual as a whole. The social rules restrict interaction and treatment of equality to different social classes and races. This is shown in twelve harper lees To Kill a Mockingbird in the conviction and trial of tom Robinson were he was wrongfully convicted because of his colour and the social exclusion and demise of Mayella…

Words 1057 - Pages 5

Essay about 12 Angry Men

Amy Porter Susan Blake ISC 210 Critical thinking 26 March 2015 Twelve Angry Men The movie Twelve Angry men directed by Sidney Lumet is about following the closing arguments in a murder trial, the 12 members of the jury must deliberate, with a guilty verdict meaning death for the accused, an inner-city teen. As the dozen men try to reach a unanimous decision. While everyone believe the teen is guilty right away all expect one juror. Making so they have to look at all the evidence again to reach…

Words 742 - Pages 3

Juror 3 seems simple - TAM Essay

first Juror 3 seems to be a simple character, but is in fact the most complicated. In Reginald Rose’s “Twelve Angry Men”, Juror 3 seems to be a really stubborn, prejudiced, angry man, but in reality he is very experienced and has lived a complicate life. The play takes place in a jury room of a 1950’s murder trial where a young boy has been accused of the murder of his father. It follows the twelve jurors as the deliberate and discuss the case on the hot, stormy summer’s day. Throughout the duration…

Words 908 - Pages 4

Prejudice In Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

Prejudice is seen throughout society today. Prejudice causes many groups to discriminate, and become racist towards that group that has a lot of prejudice against. Prejudice, today, is what society believes to be right or wrong. The characters from Of Mice and Men, By John Steinbeck, and Aristotle and Dante, By Benjamin Saenz, and 12 Angry Men, by Sherman L Sergel, all believe they are seen negatively by society based on prejudice they have heard. This prejudice affects all of these characters in…

Words 1135 - Pages 5

Rugmaker: Juror Essay

English Text Response – High ‘Prejudice is the only obstacle to discovering the truth in ’12 Angry Men’? Discuss Reginald Rose conveys a tainted society, where truth is contaminated by irrationality and ignorance, and justice is repressed by prejudice and egotistical motive. The fragile bias state of the American Justice System is exploited, and the warped, bigoted condition of society is exposed, as a 1957 New York jury is forced to decide the fate of a young, delinquent on trial for the murder…

Words 1258 - Pages 6

Essay about Mr MM goes to the MM

perceptive play "Twelve Angry Men", demonstrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" verdict with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the beginning of the play, Rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the courtroom. However, as the play progresses a seed of doubt is planted and the importance of self-prejudice hindering…

Words 669 - Pages 3