Initially, the disabled community views these test results as a judicious factor against them because of how they were created from the womb. Personally, …show more content…
J.’s explanation of prenatal testing there are resources to support his research such as, according to Amy Harmon’s Tracking Prenatal Health, doctors and genetic counselors will give statistics about a child who has genetic defects and the option for an abortion, but will leave the final decision to the patients on what life might be like with a disabled child. Also within Steven Ertelt’s Judge’s Ruling article, there is a quote by Charmaine Yoest who is the president for AULP, in which she states that society should not discriminate a child regardless of the disability. Along with Susan Scutti’s False Positive Prenatal Tests, “…a developing baby might have a 36 percent chance of not having a test for a chromosomal condition.” These three supporting facts provide a foundational system for the views and facts given within Crayton’s article. Throughout the initial article there is significance, since the evidence builds a solidified side to the prenatal testing controversy. Another view would be the different terms and logical reasoning that are presented in the reading to aid a reader to be persuaded to choose which side of the controversy to be on. However, in the reading there is a major bias towards the downfall to prenatal testing. The author could have done a better job with interjecting more positive sides to the controversial topic. Lastly, the evidence given demonstrates a well thought out understanding about the prenatal testing results to his