Supreme Court case, United States v. Wade, revealed the following revelation. “The identification of strangers is proverbially untrustworthy….A major factor contributing to the high incidence of miscarriage of justice from mistaken identification has been the degree of suggestion inherent in the manner in which the prosecution presents the suspect to witness for pretrial identification” (Hall, 2014, p. 506). The fact is that these suggestions are not just conducted intentionally, but they also can be unintentional (Hall, 2014). A pretrial identification that I would find to be unduly suggestive would include the types of photos used in a photographic array. If I were the prosecution, and had three witnesses and one victim to identify two suspects using a photo array, the types of photos I showed in the array would have a significant impact on how suggestive the technique is. For example, if all the photos of the potential suspects were displayed using their mug shots, which displayed these individuals in black and white striped jail uniforms while the other photos showed individuals in civilian cloths being free in society, I believe that would be too suggestive of who is guilty. Also, if the two suspects were white males in their mid-twenties and the photos used in the array only had the two suspects photos while the rest where black males in their mid-forties, this would also be too suggestive of who the witnesses are to