The problems portrayed by the Kafkaesque metaphor are of a different sort than the problem caused by surveillance. They often do not result in inhibition. Instead they are problems of information processing---the storage, use, or analysis of data---rather than of information collection. They affect the power relationships between people and the institutions of the modern state. (Solove 343)
What this means is that with all this collected data, our government can overpower us. But why should our government be given that kind of power, that it can control its citizen rather than server them? In a famous movie “V for Vendetta,” there is a famous quote “People shouldn’t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people.” It is also true for privacy. People should have privacy but government cannot, after all, government should do what it is said in the definition: a branch or service of the supreme authority of a state or nation, taken as representing the whole, servicing for all. Beside the problem of Kafkaesque, the risk of secondary use of the collected information is also a reason why I refuse the argument that people has nothing to hide about. We have no guarantee than the government won’t use the collected data other than “detect terrorism.” Government is where management of a whole country is taken place, however, there is neither a person nor an institution that oversees the government; so no one can ensure that improper secondary use will not occur. This is also being argued in the essay:
Secondary use is the exploitation of data obtained for one purpose for an unrelated purpose without the