It has been abolished and reinstated numerous times and is now deemed unconstitutional. What does this mean for the criminals that commit crimes that could have possibly carried the death penalty as a result of their crimes? Does the death penalty actually deter criminals from committing such heinous crimes? What example does the death penalty give society? The argument of being pro or anti-death penalty can go on for days no matter which side you chose. If citizens have no right to take the life of someone else, why should we allow a jury of our peers to decide if a criminal should be put to …show more content…
Sometimes there is faulty evidence that is completely circumstantial, the DNA was not correctly done, or more often than not the representation was not up to par due to lack of funds. As stated above this leads to more court proceedings, more time and money on expert witnesses, DNA processing, and sometimes the cost of a new trial if it was found to be a faulty one to begin with. Once an innocent person is actually put to death the prosecution puts no more thought into it and just moves on to the next case. This unconstitutional way of thinking is what makes the death penalty not only the ultimate punishment but also the one I would not want to have on my