Procedural Vs Substantive Due Process

Words: 1019
Pages: 5
Open Document
The difference between procedural and substantive due process refers to the procedures states must follow when it comes to the Due Process clause. Procedural due process is defined as the actions the state or federal government must follow in both civil and criminal cases before denying any person a constitutionally protected right that concerns the person’s life, liberty, or property. It also exists to help ensure procedural justice which is defined as the fairness of the process used when applying the law. Substantive due process defends individual privileges and freedoms, meaning that it identifies protected areas into which the law may not intervene. Another way to understand substantive due process is by seeing those rights, behaviors, …show more content…
Review standards applied in Constitutional cases are strict scrutiny which is defined as the most rigorous standard of judicial review used by the courts, this means that the legislative deference is absent it is compelling to state interest and the relationship between means and ends as absolutely necessary and the state also needs to provide the burden of proof. Another Standard of review is Intermediate Scrutiny which is the second level of deciding issues using judicial review. In this case it is somewhat differential, its relationship to state interest is important or substantial, the relationship between means and ends are close but not a perfect fit and the burden of proof is up to the state. And the last standard of review is Minimal Scrutiny also known as the Rational Basis Test. Most issues fall under this category. The legislative deference is highly deferential, state’s interest is rational, its relationship between means and ends is reasonably related and the burden of proof falls to the challenger. The rational basis review is the go to standard of review that courts apply when considering constitutional questions, this also includes due process or equal protection under the 5th and 14th …show more content…
In the United States Constitution there is no mention about the right to privacy, nor is it stated in the Bill of Rights, and although the right to privacy is not mentioned in either document the right to privacy has always been upheld by the courts and has been the topic of many debates especially when the subject of law and sexuality are the issues. In the Griswold v. Connecticut the right to privacy was determined when the courts said the use of birth control by a legally married couple fell under the couples right to privacy because of the first, third, fourth, fifth and ninth amendments. And although despite history saying that birth control is criminalized through the Comstock Act it would no longer fall under this law. The right to privacy in regards to the case Roe v. Wade is probably the most controversial case in history to this day. Roe v Wade has to do with the appeal based on the Texas law prohibiting all abortions expect the abortions that were considered medical necessities in order to save the life of the mother. Courts said in the Roe v Wade case that the right to privacy falls within the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Roe case was also an extension of the Griswold case because of marital privacy and since privacy is considered a basic right, the Texas abortion law continued following the strict scrutiny rule. Privacy rights conflict with association
Show More

Related Documents: Procedural Vs Substantive Due Process

Procedural Due Process Vs Substantive Due Process

as a citizen. Within the 14th Amendment it talks about a process called due process. Due process is for both the 5th and 14th Amendment which provides that no one should be deprived of their rights as citizens. The government is prohibited to act unfair to citizens. Within the due process there are two categories that branch off from it. These two categories are called procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process is when the people who enforce the law must carry it out…

Words 214 - Pages 1

Gun Lake Court Case Study

Petitioner, David Patchak, debates the constitutional validity of the Gun Lake Act as a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and as a violation of the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause in the case Patchak v. Zinke. On April 18, 2005 the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians, also known as the Gun Lake Tribe, was granted the Bradley Property, as a trust, under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. The Petitioner, David Patchak, lives in close proximity to this land and found…

Words 1229 - Pages 5

Chapter 13 Business Organization

agent is acting on behalf of himself a. An agent is personally liable on a contract she enters into with a 3rd party on behalf of an undisclosed Principal, unless the 3rd party elects to hold the principal liable CHAPTER 15 – THE REGULATORY PROCESS…

Words 2578 - Pages 11

Essay on Exam 1 study guide

Criminal law vs civil law What constitutes a crime? Why would we consider something a crime? It’s a harm to society. Criminal deals with establishing standards for SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR. Not cool to kill/steal from people. What happens when the criminal law is violated – jail time. Whats the standard of proof when it comes to criminal law? Beyone reasonable doubt. Reasonable evidence to support your claim. The state vs. someone CIVIL LAW – person vs. person ESTABLISH A STANDARD OF…

Words 1372 - Pages 6

Case Brief Case

commit suicide is constitutional". Glucksberg argued that the Washington statue violated the fourteenth amendment of due process. However, the ruling in this case stated that the right to commit suicide is not a fundamental right protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment". Later the Supreme Court ruled against Washington, stating that it did not violate due process. The Washington statue is presumed as constitutional, and if challenged must be shown to only benefit the interest of…

Words 1899 - Pages 8

Con Law Essay

into the purposes & themes of Constitution 3. Historical practice: looked to how government has acted in the past 4. Structuralism: look at the overall structure of the Constitution 5. Process-based theory: Courts primary role is to make a fair process of government but to leave substantive judgments to majority rule 6. Rights based theory: beliefs that government exists primarily to protect individuals from intrusion Two types of challenges: * As applied – claiming that…

Words 7565 - Pages 31

Introduction To The Australian Legal System Chapter 1 Essay

The essence of the rule of law is 1. Power should be exercised according to law, not arbitrarily on the basis of an individuals or groups personal whim. 2. All people are equal before the law. - The rule of law is about what is sometimes called due process. - The rule of law is interwoven with the doctrine of the separation of powers that is central to our constitutional arrangements. - The separation of legislative, executive and judicial arms of government is designed so that power does not reside…

Words 1667 - Pages 7

Essay about The Fourth Amendmet

warrant has to be written for a specific reason; not just for anything. Warrants have to say exactly what the government officials are looking for and where they need to look. “In 1886, in a case called Boyd vs. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States referred to Entick vs. Carrington as a ''great judgment,'' ''one of the landmarks of English liberty,'' and ''one of the permanent monuments of the British Constitution". This established the Entick decision as a guide to understanding…

Words 2301 - Pages 10

Tort and White Collar Crime Essay

district wherein the crime shall have been committed which district shall have been previously ,ascertained by law , and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence 8th amendment- excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive fines imposed nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. capital punishment has been…

Words 4115 - Pages 17

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

improvements that Gideon vs. Wainwright provided, these newly established rights were not provided equally to all indigent defendants. Systemic racism has left the promise of Gideon vs. Wainwright massively unfulfilled, as it has prevented all indigent defendants from equal access to the socioeconomic justice that it sought to secure. Black people are disproportionately incarcerated (footnote) and disproportionately poor (footnote) and therefore especially likely to benefit from Gideon vs. Wainwright; however…

Words 1801 - Pages 8