The Electoral College is unfair. Just point blank, unfair. My reason for stating this is because Americans are not choosing who they would like their president to be, a small group of people are. It is unfair. If the government would not like us to choose our president then they should just say it, they should not trick America into thinking that they actually vote for who they would like to be president. In the 2000 fiasco, they almost replaced most of the Electors because they didn’t like John F Kennedy. What if all of America didn’t like Kennedy? He would have been president anyways because that is who they wanted to be president. It doesn’t matter. (Paragraphs 10 and 11)
The Electoral College is more complicated. Instead of the votes from Americans, they run through the Electoral College. It adds an extra step to the process that shouldn’t be there. “Each candidate running for President in your state has his or her own …show more content…
When the Electoral College is called to make a final decision, they could very well go off their rocker and vote for someone completely different that the popular vote of Americans. In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House. When this happened, it comes to show that the Electoral college is borderline unpredictable. This is only one example of when the electoral college made a decision despite the popular vote, there have been 4 other