Pros And Cons Of Geoengineering

Words: 389
Pages: 2
Open Document
In the second debate team one won but on initial thoughts with the information that was presented in the debate feels like a draw. The ones won the debate that geoengineering is an important way of trying to sequester the current CO2 build up in the atmosphere due to the burning of fossil fuel. They brought to attention that the current methods of green energy or reducing CO2 emissions is not working well enough due to the unreliability, political issues, and cost of sustaining the current energy market with renewable energy. There are various ways in which geoengineering can be more helpful to the environment over harmful. Examples include injecting particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight back and other ways of up taking carbon.
Show More

Related Documents: Pros And Cons Of Geoengineering

Pros And Cons Of Geoengineering

While geoengineering is dangerous to our climate and ecosystems the risk may be worth the rewards. Carbon capture and sequestration poses many challenges associated with cost and storage, but the upside of emissions reduction is tremendous. Changing the albedo of earth could negatively impact oceans and ecosystems, however, it could create shade for earth thereby directly lowering global temperatures. The United States should engage in geoengineering in the near future if climate oriented policy…

Words 1477 - Pages 6