Historically, judges had virtually unlimited power to adjust sentences as they saw fit, based on whatever they decided at the time, with really no oversight (Larkin, 2014). However, in 1984 when Congress passed the Sentencing Reform Act, the reigns were pulled in tightly on judges, and the first guidelines on sentencing were used (Larkin, 2014). Congress also enacted various other types of mandatory minimum sentences on specific types of crimes, thus limiting the discretion of the …show more content…
This shift swung the power from the judges to the prosecutors (Larkin, 2014). “Judges may have to impose whatever punishment the law requires, but prosecutors are under no comparable obligation to charge a defendant with violating a law carrying a mandatory minimum penalty (Larkin)”. Furthermore, prosecutors have virtually all the power to decide exactly what to charge a person with, which allows them to essentially bargain with a person’s life, by dangling their freedom in front of them, and playing a game of Russian Roulette with regards to what charge they want to apply to the crime the suspect committed (Larkin,