Although those on the other side, “the Unitary Executive Theory has never been accepted as a valid interpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court, nor any federal court, the theory has been expressly rejected by the Supreme Court and other courts on a number of occasions” (Divoll). Those don’t like the idea of having to rely on all one source of power, as the President would reside over the entire branch. As it is stated that this theory has been reviewed and rejected multiple times so there are more than one flaw involved in this theory. As for one I would have to say that I do not support the Unitary Executive Theory or its propositions I would not want the president to have exclusive control over the executive branch and its members. I would consider that to be too much power and with no defined, exact and precise qualifications it’s not a trustworthy theory. In a current event congress passed a defense spending bill with controversial provisions authorizing the indefinite military detention, or rendering to a foreign country or entity, without charge or trial, of any person, including US citizens, detained, arrested, or captured anywhere in the world, including the