Trying to prevent people from buying a certain portion would make them question if the government is violating their rights. Body Part 1 II. State your claim
III. Point A
A. Make your first point
B. Support your first point
IV. Counterpoint A
A. Present first counterpoint
B. Support first counterpoint
V. Rebuttal A
A. State first rebuttal point
B. Support rebuttal point II. Educating people on the health risks in the consumption of sugary drinks will be a better step towards preventing obesity and diabetes.
III. Point A
A. Trying to prevent people from buying a certain portion would make them question if the government is violating their rights.
B. People are prone to react in a more positive way when a campaign is pro something good, rather than against…show more content… Support first counter point
VIII. Rebuttal B
A. State first rebuttal point
B. Support rebuttal point VI. Point B
A. As the ban does not include supermarkets, vending machines and convenience stores and refills in reality it cannot insure that people will stop consuming sugar rich drinks.
B. Even with the execution of the ban people will be able to buy and consume as much unhealthy drinks and food as they did before. Wouldn’t an educational programs aiming at giving them more information on the benefits of healthy lifestyle have better results in the long run? They can be incorporated at the working place for example. In Bulgaria there are organized football tournaments between big companies which require co-workers to train together. It is not only healthy, but benefits their social lives and the working environment as a whole.
VII. Counterpoint B
A. When served large portions, people tend to consume more than they would if they were smaller and they don’t even realize it.
B. According to Kelly Brownell, a professor of psychology and epidemiology at the department of health at Yale University, consumers will still be satisfied even if the size of their soda is not 20, but 16 ounces.
VIII. Rebuttal
