338).” Policies to end chronic homelessness in full are very progressive, and conservative viewpoints may feel like this is too extreme of a change. From a sociological approach, a functionalist theorist might say this is an inevitable issue in society. They would say that the homeless can support themselves and this theory suggests homelessness can provide solutions like job creation for people giving out welfare handouts. On the other hand, conflict theorists do not see a problem with homelessness, but they would argue that structural issues are more at fault. They would say that the reason so many people are homeless is due to social class in …show more content…
It can happen to the evicted, the laid off, the struggling addicts, and even veterans. Implementing a policy that gives funding for permanent supportive housing to the chronic homeless is the only effective direction our country can go at this time in its history. America is supposed to be a country of great wealth and opportunity but in reality it is full of disparity, people without a roof over their head, and unheard voices. Everyone should be given the right to safe and stable housing. The chronic homeless population has some of the most vulnerable people in it-people with mental illnesses, chronic health conditions, and other issues. Having a safe environment like a house will help them better themselves and have a place that will better their health conditions. Supportive housing will put them in touch with a community of individuals that will care about them and insure their road to recovery is a smooth one. Everyone is entitled to shelter, it is one of our basic needs as the human race. Once we ensure everyone housing, we can focus on other big picture issues, but it all starts in the home. Chronic homelessness is an issue people have been facing for a long time, but it is preventable with policies, funding, and housing support. Permanent supportive housing will eliminate this national issue, and soon everyone will live a life of equal