Freud treats the audience with an intentional hint of disrespect. The written words come off as dull and simple, almost blatantly calling the reader dumb. …show more content…
Notice, that he never corrects himself, nor seems to make mistakes. In the line “I hope my readers will note the difference of value between those interpretations for which there is no evidence, and the examples I have collected myself and elucidated by analysis,” (The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, 80) Freud puts his own examples above those that are lacking evidence, although there is no difference between the two. None of Freud’s 38 examples are backed up by authentic research. The excruciating amount of analysis done by Freud should not be mistaken for scientific evidence, because he provides the reader with nothing but his own opinions. He also uses himself as an example: “when I analyze those instances of forgetting names that I observe in myself, I almost always find that the name which eludes me is related to some subject closely affecting my own person,” (The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, 25) and this self-serving method is applied to all of his patients and the general