This section was amended by the Idaho legislature over the past few years, but still has many problems. First, Idaho Code 16-1513 does not provide attempt to notify a large enough of a class of potential parents. This failure makes the Idaho Code unconstitutional. The Idaho Code is immensely complicated, multilayered and does not provide proper notice to a large enough of a group of unwed fathers. The Lehr test, for a putative father statute, is still good law and controls the rights unwed fathers …show more content…
First, section II cover how the Supreme Court has ruled of this topic and how the Idaho Supreme Court has interpreted that ruling. In a series of four cases: Stanley v. Illinois, Quilloin v. Walcott, Caban v. Mohammed, and finally Lehr v. Roberston. The Lehr case is the most crucial of all four. Lehr provides the “biology-plus standard,” stating that a putative father’s biology offers him the opportunity that no other man has, but he must grasp the opportunity by building a relationship with the child. States must have a statutory scheme that includes most responsible unwed fathers within the requirement for notice and they cannot place the ability to qualify for notice completely outside the reach of the unwed